OPEXSTUDIO
← All lessons and training aids OPEX learning notes / Frontline problem solving

Jidoka and andon: detect, respond, verify restart

Define abnormality. Follow the visual, practise a decision, then check your thinking.

Fictional teaching examples and AI-generated illustrations. Proposed changes and goals are not achieved results. Use the written instructions and check local conditions before applying a method.

Download this exact reviewed edition ↗

Teaching view 1 of 2

Jidoka and andon: detect, respond, verify restart

Connected method map: Detect abnormality, Signal and protect, Qualified response, Restart criteria met?, Resume and learn. Every authored connection is shown with a numbered arrow and named legend.
Original OPEX teaching diagram. Follow the steps below, then try the practice question. View full size ↗

Detection only protects customers when it triggers a response. Define the normal condition, the abnormality signal, who responds and what must be verified before work resumes. When a problem appears, follow the approved stop and containment rule so suspect work does not escape. The responding leader or specialist resolves the condition and confirms the restart criteria. Record recurrence for deeper investigation. Different processes have different stopping conventions; a fixed-position production stop is not an emergency-stop instruction. A red lamp without response ownership and follow-through merely displays the problem. The system must help people surface trouble early.

Follow the method

  1. Detect abnormality
  2. Signal and protect
  3. Qualified response
  4. Restart criteria met?
  5. Resume and learn

Read the example carefully

An andon lamp alone is not jidoka.

A process-stop convention is not emergency-stop guidance.

Supports one-piece flow; Daily management tracks repeated losses.

Teaching view 2 of 2

A reset is not the restart decision

A response trace links an observed confirmation failure to the affected-unit boundary, authorized verification and operator feedback.
Original OPEX teaching diagram. Follow the steps below, then try the practice question. View full size ↗

Fictional assembly cell: operator Leon sees an incomplete fastening confirmation on unit V18 and raises the approved help signal. A colleague clears the display and proposes restarting because the light is no longer on. The response card requires confirmation of the fastening result and controlled review of potentially affected units.

Follow the method

  1. Detect
  2. Contain
  3. Respond
  4. Verify
  5. Learn

Read the example carefully

Follow the approved escalation and safe-state procedure; the target does not create restart authority.

A missing response route is a system issue to expose, not a reason to substitute unverified output.

Apply the method

The light is off, but the condition remains

Connect an abnormality signal to containment, response ownership and verified restart, distinguishing signal reset from evidence that the process is ready.

Fictional assembly cell: operator Leon sees an incomplete fastening confirmation on unit V18 and raises the approved help signal. A colleague clears the display and proposes restarting because the light is no longer on. The response card requires confirmation of the fastening result and controlled review of potentially affected units.

Role: Operator, team leader and authorized quality/equipment responder.

Normal condition

An abnormality receives a timely response; unsuitable output does not proceed, and restart follows the approved acceptance conditions.

The gap

Clearing a display has been confused with correcting and verifying the underlying condition.

  • Use the site’s actual approved stop/help procedure. A process andon is not a substitute for emergency response.
  • This exercise gives no equipment setting, isolation sequence or authority to override safeguards.
Supplied case inputs
Event / requirementSupplied evidence
SignalIncomplete fastening confirmation on V18
Last verified boundaryV15 accepted before the abnormal sequence
Potentially affectedV16, V17 and V18 require review
DisplayReset by colleague; condition not verified
Restart criteriaAuthorized process check and affected-output disposition
OwnerTeam leader calls designated quality/equipment responder
  1. Treat the condition as the trigger

    Leon identifies the observed incomplete confirmation and uses the approved response route. He records the unit identity and time, without guessing that the sensor or operator caused it.

    Why: An andon makes an abnormality visible and requests response. A color change is not a root-cause finding.

    Evidence: V18 and the missing confirmation are recorded as facts.

  2. Preserve the affected-output boundary

    The responder uses the last verified evidence at V15 to identify V16–V18 for controlled review under the local procedure. Their status remains distinct from accepted output.

    Why: Containment needs a justified boundary. Looking only at the signaled unit may miss earlier affected work; assuming every unit is defective also exceeds the evidence.

    Evidence: Three potentially affected units identified; defect status not yet determined.

  3. Respond through the authorized owner

    The team leader brings the designated responder to the actual condition, supplies the record and maintains the approved stopped/held state as required.

    Why: The operator needs support and a known response, not pressure to clear the board. Technical adjustments belong to authorized people and procedures.

    Evidence: Named responder, response time and investigation record are visible.

  4. Verify before restart

    Check the prescribed process conditions and acceptance evidence, then record the authorized restart decision and the disposition of affected output. If criteria are unmet, continue the response.

    Why: Reset, repair, verification and product disposition are separate events. None should be inferred from the display alone.

    Evidence: Restart requires documented criteria met; V16–V18 remain controlled until disposition.

  5. Close the learning loop

    Return the result to Leon and review recurrence, response delay and any weakness in detection or standard work. Update and teach approved changes through their owners.

    Why: Without feedback, people may stop raising useful signals. The system should learn from the abnormality rather than reward silence.

    Evidence: Operator feedback and a recurrence review are part of the completed response.

Completed abnormality-response trace
StageEvidenceDecision
DetectV18 confirmation missingRaise approved help signal
ContainLast verified V15Review V16–V18
RespondNamed quality/equipment ownerInvestigate actual condition
VerifyDisplay reset onlyInsufficient for restart
LearnResponse/recurrence recordFeed back to operator

The responder cannot attend immediately

The designated responder is unavailable and a production target is approaching.

Follow the approved escalation and safe-state procedure; the target does not create restart authority.

A missing response route is a system issue to expose, not a reason to substitute unverified output.

Escalation owner, current state and next contact are recorded.

A labeling confirmation fails

Separate fictional packing line: unit P24 has an unreadable verification result. P20 is the last unit with confirmed acceptance; P21–P24 have been produced since. An operator resets the light.

Changed practice inputs
InputValue
Last verified unitP20
Signal unitP24
Intervening unitsP21, P22, P23, P24
Display statusReset; no verification result

Your task

  1. Identify the potentially affected range without calling all items defective.
  2. Write the next response and restart evidence.
  3. Explain why the reset alone cannot release the range.

Prepare your worksheet

  • Observed condition and identity
  • Last verified boundary
  • Potentially affected units
  • Authorized verification/disposition
  • Operator feedback and recurrence check
Reveal the answer and reasoning

The supplied boundary identifies four potentially affected units, P21–P24. Their suitability needs the approved review.

Use the named response/escalation owner; obtain process verification and product disposition under the actual criteria.

A display reset reports a control action, not proof of suitable labels or a corrected process.

Worked answer record
ItemEvidenceConclusion
BoundaryP20 acceptedReview starts after P20
Affected rangeP21–P244 units potentially affected
ResetNo verificationNo release inference
RestartCriteria and authority neededRecord decision

Check these interpretations

  • An andon is not merely a colored performance display.
  • A reset is not a verified corrective action.

Check your work

  • Use a justified containment boundary.
  • Keep product and process decisions distinct.
  • Retain an authorized response and feedback loop.

Run a practice session

Materials

  • Unit identity cards and response-state tokens
  • Approved-procedure placeholder rather than invented technical instructions
  1. Read the abnormality · 4 minutes

    What was observed, and what is only a guess?

  2. Set the review boundary · 8 minutes

    Why start with V16 rather than only V18?

  3. Work the labeling variant · 8 minutes

    What does resetting the light establish?

  4. Close the response · 5 minutes

    What should the operator hear back?

Debrief

  • Challenge pressure to treat the target as restart authority.
  • Distinguish a normal process help signal from emergency procedures.

Write separate detect, contain, respond, verify and learn records; do not merge them into a single “fixed” box.

Transfer into the work

Owner: Cell leader with authorized quality/equipment owners

Record: Abnormality, containment, verification, disposition and feedback record

Review: At response closure and the next recurrence review

Evidence: Criteria-based restart, controlled affected output and timely operator support

Escalate response capacity and unresolved conditions; retain the required controlled state.

Build on reliable methods

Sources and further reading

  • Toyota Virtual Plant Tour: Production System ↗

    Andon response, stopping on abnormality, mistake prevention

    Method reference; original OPEX scenario and diagram are synthetic teaching content, not source case results.
  • LEI: Andon ↗

    Abnormality signal summons response; fixed-position process stop differs from emergency stop

    Method reference; original OPEX scenario and diagram are synthetic teaching content, not source case results.
Free learning resources

Take the lesson into your team.

Read the lessons online or use these PDFs to prepare, practise and review with your team. No sign-in needed.

Facilitators and team leads

Facilitator guide

Case objectives, demonstration plans, debriefs, common mistakes and application checks across all 81 workplace cases and method lessons.

Download Facilitator guide PDF · 166 pages · 65.1 MB
Learners and improvement teams

Learner workbook

Printable case worksheets, blank observation records and five calculation exercises; answers are separate.

Download Learner workbook PDF · 169 pages · 10.7 MB
Learners after practice and facilitators

Answer key and coaching notes

Reasoned sample responses, worked calculations and coaching guidance; fictional examples are clearly labelled.

Download Answer key and coaching notes PDF · 105 pages · 8.5 MB
Practitioners and facilitators seeking detailed worked methods

Method and application reference

The native method mechanisms and worked applications for all 68 detailed lessons, in a separate bookmarked portrait reference.

Download Method and application reference PDF · 141 pages · 10.2 MB
Self-study learners and workshop groups

Illustrated systems atlas

Five illustrated system chapters: 15 Flare concept maps and 26 original workplace teaching cards, with links to all 81 supporting cases and method lessons.

Download Illustrated systems atlas PDF · 69 pages · 55.8 MB
Connect the methods

Use the next tool for the next question.

  • Approved response authority
  • Clear acceptance condition
Explore all chapters and detailed lessons →